“Twerk” Doesn’t Need the Oxford Dictionary to Exist

twerk oxford dictionary

The word “twerk” has been added to the Oxford dictionary.

The word “twerk” is not new. The act of twerking is not new. But the dance that finds its origins deep in African culture has recently been snapped up by mainstream media; gobbled up by white suburban kids; paraded on morning talk shows as “the new hot craze”….and, of course, appropriated and mutilated by the infamous Miley Cyrus. The word “twerk” has been in non-white vocabularies for ages; the act of twerking has been in non-white communities for even longer. So why is it being reported as new?

Because in the mind of a white-dominated culture, nothing truly exists until it has been acknowledged by white people.

“Twerk” could have been added to the Oxford dictionary years ago: it’s been used enough—maybe not by white English speakers, but plenty by black English speakers. Yet it takes Miley Cyrus’s pale, boney, rhythmless gyrations to validate a word whose roots stretch extensively beyond the years she has even existed on this planet. Miley Cyrus did not invent twerking, contrary to morning talk show hosts’ beliefs. White suburban girls did not invent twerking. Yet black girls and women—the true progenitors—have not only been roundly criticized as whorish and scandalous for doing at clubs, parties, etc. what Miley Cyrus has done on a stage in front of millions, they have also been robbed: the true inventors of what has become a part of mainstream culture, obscured.

Just as America had not truly been discovered until Columbus set his chalky, aimless foot on it, nothing truly has been done until its been done by white people. No ass has truly twerked until that ass is a Caucasian one.

It is a matter of ownership, but also one of identity. The Oxford Dictionary defines twerking as follows:



[no object] informal

  • dance to popular music in a sexually provocative manner involving thrusting hip movements and a low, squatting stance:

 just wait till they catch their daughters twerking to this song

twerk it girl, work it girl


1990s: probably an alteration of work


To say nothing of the sexist implications in the usage example, look at the origin. “1990s.” Not who, not how, not where. “Probably an alteration of work.” Probably?

It is easy to make the mistake of thinking that mainstream exposure means just that: exposure. Of the truth, of history, of origins. Don’t be fooled. It can just as easily mean deletion—of truth, of history, of people.

Twerking exists whether the Oxford Dictionary acknowledges it or not, just as it existed before Miley Cyrus got her hands on it. A word does not need to be spoken by white lips before that word is real. Colonization is constantly mutating. I hope you’re paying attention.

Tagged , , , , , , ,

5 thoughts on ““Twerk” Doesn’t Need the Oxford Dictionary to Exist

  1. Hahahahahahahaaa, uhhh, Yep… all true. It was done and I was doing it when I was a young girl, “Unfortunately” – and I am now 50 – to give you an idea of how far back it goes. As I grew into being a REAL woman, I would not be caught, echm, “Un-dead” doing such a thing! Did not allow my daughters to do such a thing. As for me, a black woman originally from Mississippi – I find it loose, degrading, mannish, whorish for sure. I’m embarrassed everytime I see it being done, and I’m ashamed that at the age of 12, I actually did such a thing. However, I was told I couldn’t dance, and to show my thang… I did it. No adults were present, my mother was not present, if she had been, I would have gotten the worse butt whipping of my life, and let me tell you, I got some butt whippings.

    Miley can HAVE IT… it looks no better with her doing it, than when I see young, lost, confused and “UN-raised” black women doing it, in rhythm or NOT. As a nation, as a people, we are all… sooooo going down a nasty, uncleaned, well stained unsanitized toilet.

    Once again O.C. – you are spot on! ;-)

  2. LetmebeRae says:

    LOL! I loved how you compared this to Columbus. But you have a very good point nonetheless with this article.

  3. I like your unadulterated opinions on things, and the way you express them. :)

Drop some knowledge

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: